Legal Opinion

Eastman Kodak Co. v. Gray

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 21, 1934No. 709PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McReynolds

In an action at law, respondent Gray alleged that the petitioners had infringed his patent for a power transmitting mechanism and asked damages. The patent contains six claims; he relied upon all except the fourth. A plea of the general issue and notice of special matters raised questions of novelty, invention and infringement.

The cause was first tried to a jury, Judge Dickinson presiding. Certain facts were stipulated; witnesses were examined by both parties; there were many exhibits. The jury found for respondent; the Judge granted a new trial because he deemed the charge inadequate.

Thereupo…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lewellyn v. Electric Reduction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Arthur C. Harvey Co. v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1933

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Shapleigh v. MierSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Barry v. HallCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  3. McCaughn v. Real Estate Land Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Divide Creek Irr. Dist. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  5. United States v. ShingleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API