Coyle v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
McCLUNG, Justice.
Jean Coyle was charged with the offense of driving a motor vehicle without a license. She appealed her municipal court convictions to County Court for a trial de novo. That court found her guilty. Noting her desire to pursue a further appeal, that court set her punishment at the minimum amount necessary to invoke this Court’s jurisdiction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Coyle first alleges that the trial court erred in referring to her as appearing pro se. She claims that the correct term is that she appeared pro per (more properly in pro per), that is, in persona.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Reitz v. MealeySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- McWherter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Gillaspie v. Department of Public SafetyTexas Supreme Court · 1953
- Harkins v. Murphy & BolanzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Ex Parte Arnold, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
- Rose v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Naff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Osborne v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
- Ex Parte Drake, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.