Harkins v. Murphy & Bolanz
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error to the District Court of Dallas County. Tried below before Hon. Richard Morgan.
1Opinion of the Court
RAINEY, Chief Justice.
This suit was instituted in the District Court of Dallas County by James Harkins, acting by his agent and attorney in fact, Herman Kruegel, against Murphy & Bolanz, and others, as defendants, in the nature of a bill of review, and to set aside the judgment, and for a new trial in case Ho. 20340, styled James Harkins v, Murphy & Bolanz et al., the judgment therein having been rendered May 17, 1901. The pleadings of plaintiff are voluminous, consisting of 47 pages of typewritten matter. The defendants excepted to the petition, among other things, for the reason that the…
2Cited by36 opinions
- Carroll v. Jaques Admiralty Law FirmCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- The PEOPLE v. CoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Kurtz v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Coyle v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
- Charles Ben Howell v. State Bar of TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.