Legal Opinion
Rose v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided October 15, 1990No. 05-89-01040-CRPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KINKEADE, Justice.
Emmanuel P. Rose appeals his conviction for speeding. After a trial de novo, the county criminal court of appeals assessed punishment at a fine of $101. In three points of error, Rose claims that the county criminal court of appeals: (1) erred when it denied his motion to quash the complaint, his motion to dismiss, and his amended motion for new trial because the complaint was not made in the county where the offense occurred; (2) erred in failing to grant him judgment; and (3) erred when it permitted the State to prove the identity of appellant by requiring him to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- McWherter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- United States v. Frederick PraetoriusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Wells v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Kindley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Ross v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Naff v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- State v. LangCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.