Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Wurn v. Kasserman

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 26, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown,J.

This case is before us on a demurrer to an information in quo warranto and the motion to quash the rule to show cause issued herein.

This proceeding was commended here by petition for writ of quo warranto in the name of the State on the relation of William G. Wurn and Correll L. Hamilton, against Jacob Kasserman and four other persons who it is alleged are exercising the offices, franchises, liberties and powers of “City Managers” of the City of Lake Helen, Florida, claiming to be such by virtue of Chapter 18,639, Special Acts of 1937, which said Chapter purports to create the City of Lake…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BryanSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  2. State v. GleasonSupreme Court of Florida · 1868
  3. Town of Enterprise v. State ex rel. Attorney-GeneralSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  4. State Ex Rel. Johnson v. City of SarasotaSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  5. State Ex Rel. Watkins v. FernandezSupreme Court of Florida · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Heyward v. HallSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Dato v. HimesSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. State Ex Rel. Harris v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  4. State Ex Rel. Vaughn v. BeallSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API