Legal Opinion

Gianarelli v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 1, 1965No. 20583PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frantz

This action arose out of a slip and fall on premises operated by Safeway Stores, Inc. Clarence and Ramona were husband and wife, and each sought to recover damages alleged to have resulted to them respectively from the physical injuries sustained by Ramona.

At the close of their case, the trial court directed the verdict against them and in favor of Safeway Stores. In its ruling the trial court ‘discussed the law applicable to cases of the character under consideration, observing “that there must be an existing danger which perhaps did exist in this particular case.” It found, however, that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. King Soopers, Inc. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. Swanson v. MartinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1949
  3. Parker v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Rudolph v. ElderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  5. Bailey v. KING SOOPERS, INC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Neva I. Smith v. Mill Creek Court, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  2. Denver Dry Goods Company v. GettmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  3. Rice v. GroatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  4. Gianarelli v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1965
  5. Rice v. GroatSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API