Legal Opinion

King Soopers, Inc. v. Mitchell

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 3, 1959No. 18306PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

Plaintiff in error, operator, of a grocery supermarket, was the defendant in the trial court in an action in which the plaintiff obtained a personal injury judgment in the amount of $10,000. The action grew out of plaintiff’s falling on some ice in a parking lot which was maintained by the defendant adjacent to its store for the use of customers. The plaintiff suffered a broken hip which necessitated an internal reduction operation. Defendant claims that the evidence was insufficient and that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. On these grounds it seeks…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Denver City Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  2. Rudolph v. ElderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1939
  3. Catlett v. Colorado & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1914
  4. Brent v. Bank of AuroraSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  5. Scott v. MatsudaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
  2. Tharp v. Bunge Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Jacqueline E. Michalski v. The Home Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  4. Hanson v. Town & Country Shopping Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  5. Dawson v. Payless for DrugsOregon Supreme Court · 1967

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API