Legal Opinion
Diowchi v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 22, 1963No. Civ. 27159PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKingsley, J.
Petitioner is the assignee for collection of a firm of attorneys. These attorneys (hereinafter collectively referred to as “Beilensons”) were retained by the real party in interest to represent her in a divorce action. During the pendency of that action, respondent court made and entered its order directing the husband to pay directly to them the sum of $7,500 on account of attorney fees and $4,000 on account of costs. This order was secured by a lien, in favor of wife, on certain real and personal property. The husband duly appealed from this order (although it appears from the petition that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Neblett v. GettyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Weil v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
- Schwartz v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Pacific Engine & Machine Works v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Bergan v. BadhamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Childs v. EltingeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Rader v. ThrasherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Wood v. WoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- Hall v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983