Legal Opinion
State v. Hopperstad
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 7, 1985No. CX-84-1813PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEDGWICK, Judge.
John Douglas Hopperstad was convicted of violating § 10.06(3), disorderly conduct, of the Austin city ordinance, and he appealed. We reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
On January 17, 1984, Hopperstad was arrested for disorderly conduct following a scuffle at the Law Enforcement Center in Austin. In the course of the scuffle, Hop-perstad was maced. He later claimed an injury caused by the mace, and Austin police captain Gordon Bjorgo was requested to conduct an internal investigation into the incident in case any civil suit was initiated by Hopperstad.
All police…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Boland v. MorrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ParadeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Erickson v. MacArthurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. StewartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. CaudillMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
- State, City of Minneapolis v. LynchCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.