Legal Opinion
Erickson v. MacArthur
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided November 6, 1987No. C1-87-113PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
Defendants/Petitioners, individual police officers of the Cities of Minnetonka and Eden Prairie, seek review of an Order Compelling Discovery of certain eyewitness statements taken during an Internal Affairs investigation conducted by the police department of the City of Minnetonka. The trial court ordered release without conducting an in camera inspection of the documents in question. We vacate the order and remand for in camera inspection in light of this opinion.
This action arises out of a party on August 25, 1984 at the Minnetonka home of plaintiffs, Donald and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Frankenhauser v. RizzoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Spell v. McDanielDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1984
- Baskerville v. BaskervilleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- State v. ParadeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. HopperstadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. BurrellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- Demers v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1991
- Dyrdal v. Golden Nuggets, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.