Legal Opinion

Crouch v. Roemer

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 28, 1881No. 196PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Appear from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey. This is a suit in equity by George Crouch against William Roemer to prevent the infringement by the latter of reissued letters-patent No. 4289, granted March 7,1871, to the complainant for an improvement in straps for shawls. Among the defences set up by the respondent was the want of novelty and the prior public use of the invention described in the letters.

Read the full summary

Appear from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey. This is a suit in equity by George Crouch against William Roemer to prevent the infringement by the latter of reissued letters-patent No. 4289, granted March 7,1871, to the complainant for an improvement in straps for shawls. Among the defences set up by the respondent was the want of novelty and the prior public use of the invention described in the letters. The remaining facts are stated in the opinion of the court. The court below sustained the defence and dismissed the bill. Crouch thereupon appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Chiee Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellant in this case, complainant below, in describing his invention, when he applied for his patent, said that before his. invention “ straps had been used to confine a shawl, or similar article, in a bundle, and a leather cross-piece, with loops at tbe ends, had extended from one strap to the other ;■ and above, and attached to this leather cross-piece, was a handle.” He then said: “ My invention consists of a rigid cross-bar beneath the handle, combined with straps that are passed, around the shawl or bundle, such straps…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States Industrial Chemical Co. v. Theroz Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
  2. Lincoln Stores, Inc. v. Nashua Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
  3. Sloan Filter Co. v. Portland Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  4. In re WalshCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1905
  5. Walker Mfg. Co. v. Illinois Brass Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API