Legal Opinion

Reeder v. Frank

District Court, D. Utah

Decided March 19, 1992No. 90-C-0506-SPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

SAM, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The Court, having considered the relevant facts, pleadings and law, now issues its memorandum decision.

I. Facts

Plaintiff, Ivan C. Reeder (“Reeder”), brought this action against Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States (the “Postmaster”). Reeder, a postal employee, alleges that he has been discriminated against as a result of a speech impediment. The Postmaster concedes that Reeder has a speech “impairment,” although the parties dispute its severity. 1

Reeder has…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Partlow v. RunyonDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1993
  2. Powers v. MJB Acquisition Corp.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1998
  3. Dorn v. PotterDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Fraginals v. Postmaster GeneralDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
  5. Morningstar Blackhorse v. United States of America, United States Postal Service; Dale West, Jr.; Susan “Suzie” Yarbro; Michael King; and Yet-To-Be-Identified Co-Conspirators and/or Other Liable IndividualsDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2026

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API