Legal Opinion
Dorn v. Potter
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 28, 2002No. Civil Action 00-448PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
LANCASTER, District Judge.
This is an action in employment discrimination. Plaintiff, Paul Dorn, alleges that he was subjected to a hostile work environment and eventually discharged from his employment with the United States Postal Service because of his disability in violation of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, 29 U.S.C. § 794 (“Rehabilitation Act”). Plaintiff seeks money damages.
Defendant has filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing, inter alia, that the undisputed material facts show that plaintiff was not disabled under the law.
For the reasons set forth below, defendant’s…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peter v. Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002
- Marshall v. Sisters of Holy Family of NazarethDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Scharffenberger v. Kirkland (In Re Allegheny Health, Education & Research Foundation)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2005
- Morgan v. Allison Crane & Rigging LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2023