Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Kramer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 13, 1991No. Misc. (Subtitle BV) No. 31, September Term, 1990PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHASANOW, Judge.

Once again we are called upon to discharge an unpleasant obligation and discipline a Maryland attorney. Richard E. Kramer has been a member of the Maryland bar since 1973. Kramer, who is both a businessman and a lawyer, stands accused of violating the following Disciplinary Rules contained in the Code of Professional Responsibility 1 , which was in effect at the time of the events that now bring him before us:

DR 1-102 Misconduct.

(A) A lawyer shall not:(4) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit, or misrepresentation.(6) Engage in any other conduct that adversely…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND OF MARYLAND v. OwrutskyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  3. Central Cab Co. v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COM'N OF MARYLAND v. HambyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. ClementsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DiCiccoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BreschiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API