Legal Opinion

State v. Knapp

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 26, 1983No. 82-267-CRPublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

David Knapp appeals from the denial of a motion to vacate his sentence. We reject the arguments that the sixth amendment entitles an attorney to be present at a presentence interview and that the safeguards created in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), are applicable at such meetings. We affirm.

In June 1981, Knapp pled guilty to one count of burglary and resisting an officer. The trial court, on its own motion, ordered a presentence report and deferred sentencing for thirty days. Although the decision to call for a report was announced in open court and in the presence of the defense…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. StricklandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. John Lewis Jones v. Harold J. Cardwell, Superintendent, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  5. Neely v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In re CarterSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
  2. State v. McQuayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. LindhWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  4. United States v. HoltUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. State v. GreveWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API