Legal Opinion
Neely v. State
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided June 2, 1970No. State 154PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.
The defendant was convicted and sentenced on charges of burglary and possession of marijuana. Two issues are raised by writs of error. One relates to the sufficiency of the evidence as to the marijuana conviction. The other involves the sentencing procedure as to both the burglary and marijuana charges.
Sufficiency of evidence.
The defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, claiming that it does not sustain the conviction on the possessing marijuana charge. Here the test on review is . . whether this court can conclude the trier of the facts could, acting reasonably, be convinced to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Lock v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- McCleary v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- People v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- Rosado v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- In INTEREST OF DH v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. FarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.