Legal Opinion
Bowers v. Wayne Lovelady Dodge, Inc.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided August 1, 1969No. 286PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENDLEY, Judge.
Plaintiff contends the trial court erred in granting defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the ground that the statute of limitations had run on plaintiff’s claim for compensation benefits. We disagree.
Plaintiff received a head injury on January 22, 1966 while in the course of his employment. With the exception of a few days in the hospital plaintiff continued to work until the date of his discharge on December 5, 1967. The workmen’s compensation claim was filed on January 12, 1968.
The limitations statute in force at the time of plaintiff’s accident on January 22,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Noland v. Young Drilling CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Garcia v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1956
- Cordova v. Union Baking CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- McCleskey v. NC Ribble CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- Moody v. HastingsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gomez v. Hausman CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- W. R. Grasle Co. v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Zengerle v. City of SocorroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
- Romero v. American Furniture CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Salazar v. Albuquerque TribuneNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.