Legal Opinion

McCleskey v. NC Ribble Company

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided April 25, 1969No. 271PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Awarded workmen’s compensation for a 20% partial permanent disability, plaintiff appeals. He contends the finding of partial disability is insufficient to support the conclusion of law on which the award is based. Conclusions of law must be supported by the findings of fact. Goldie v. Yaker, 78 N.M. 485, 432 P.2d 841 (1967).

The asserted insufficiency of the finding is based on the definition of partial disability in § 59-10-12.19, N.M.S.A.1953 (Repl. Vol. 9, pt. 1, Supp.1967). Plaintiff contends this section states a two part requirement for partial disability. He claims…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ortega v. New Mexico State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Brundage v. KL House Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Goldie v. YakerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Bell v. Kenneth P. Thompson Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Cordova v. Union Baking CompanyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Matter of PernellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Marcus Ex Rel. Estate of Marcus v. CorteseNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Alvillar v. HatfieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Griego v. Bag 'N Save Food EmporiumNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Richardson Ford Sales, Inc. v. JohnsonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API