Legal Opinion
Meyer v. Parkin
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 19, 1984No. C9-83-1128PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court granting respondent Parkin’s motion for dismissal and entry of judgment thereon. Appellants Meyer contend the court erred in holding that Minn.Stat. § 504.18 (1982) did not remove the element of scienter from the rule that a lessor has a duty to warn a lessee of any concealed defects the lessor knew or should have known existed. We affirm.
FACTS
From December 1, 1978 to late December 1979, appellants Meyer lived in an apartment owned and rented to them by respondent Parkin. During the Meyer tenancy, one of their three…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Breimhorst v. BeckmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Johnson v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Harpel v. FallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Fritz v. WarthenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Curry v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Peterson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Bloom v. Hydrotherm, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Hanson v. RoeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Oakland v. StenlundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- Ranalli v. Edro Motel Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.