Legal Opinion

Hanson v. Roe

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 27, 1985No. C3-85-187PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant, Andora P. Hanson, trustee for the next of kin of decedent Osbjorn Hanson (Hanson), brought this action against respondents Leonard and Mabel Roe, alleging that the Roes’ negligent maintenance of a stairway in their home caused Hanson’s death. The jury determined that Hanson was negligent and the Roes were not. Appellant’s motion for a new trial or for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was denied. We affirm.

FACTS

Hanson had lived with the Roes for seven years before his death at age eighty. The Roes live on a farm in rural Gary, Minnesota. Mr. Roe retired…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jenson v. Touche Ross & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  2. Ryan v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. GaravaliaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. Lamb v. JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  5. Blue Water Corp., Inc. v. O'TOOLESupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Broughton v. MaesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Werner Enterprises Inc. v. Brophy Ex Rel. BrophyWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Unzen v. City of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Broughton v. MaesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API