Legal Opinion

People v. Sampson

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1953No. 32893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maxwell

Plaintiff in error, Arthur V. Sampson, was tried and found guilty by a jury on a charge of infamous crime against nature in the circuit court of La Salle County and was sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of one to ten years. He brings the cause here contending that the proof of guilt was insufficient, the State’s Attorney’s cross-examination was prejudicial, and the court erred in admitting incompetent and irrelevant exhibits to be introduced into evidence on behalf of the People.

Plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was a man 46 years old at the time of the alleged offense…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. People v. MasonIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  3. People v. ZurekIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  4. The People v. KrausIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Crane v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. GacyIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  2. People v. GilyardAppellate Court of Illinois · 1970
  3. People v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. State v. ShotleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  5. People v. WendtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API