Legal Opinion
Mead Johnson & Co. v. Abbott Laboratories
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided April 12, 2000No. 99-2215PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Per curiam
Abbott Laboratories has filed a petition for rehearing asking us to remand so that the district court may increase the amount of the injunction bond. A higher bond would produce a higher potential award of damages for wrongful injunction, because we have already held that the district court should not have awarded preliminary injunctive relief. According to Abbott, Coyne-Delany Co. v. Capital Development Board, 717 F.2d 385, 394 (7th Cir.1983), holds that it is possible to increase the injunction bond even after the injunction has been reversed.
Coyne-Delany does not hold any such thing. None…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Abbott Laboratories v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Castrol Inc. v. Pennzoil Company and Pennzoil Products CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Johnson & Johnson v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Thomas & Betts Corporation and Thomas & Betts Holdings, Inc. v. Panduit Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Clorox Co. Puerto Rico v. Proctor & Gamble Commercial Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Pernod Ricard USA, LLC v. Bacardi U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Groupe SEB USA, Inc. v. Euro-Pro Operating LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Auto Driveaway Franchise Sys., LLC v. Auto Driveaway Richmond, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- American Italian Pasta Company v. New World Pasta CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.