Legal Opinion

United States v. A. E. Edwards, T/a Apex Amusement Company, Claimant-Intervenor of Five (5) Coin-Operated Gaming Devices and $257.20 in Coin

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided November 3, 1966No. 10637PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAVEN, Circuit Judge:

We share with the district court concern for the plight of taxpayer, A. E. Edwards. Convinced that Edwards had been unfairly treated by his government, the district judge was initially disposed to enter judgment in his favor requiring release of certain property seized by the United States. Subsequently, upon examination of the authorities, the district court concluded that it was without power to afford relief, and entered judgment in favor of the United States, from which judgment Edwards has appealed. United States v. Five (5) Coin-Operated Gaming Devices, 246 F.Supp.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. One 1936 Model Ford V-8 De Luxe Coach, Commercial Credit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  2. Cotonificio Bustese, S. A. v. MorgenthauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. United States v. Five (5) Coin-operated Gaming DevicesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1965
  4. United States v. Five (5) Coin-Operated Gaming DevicesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1965

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. United States v. United States Coin & CurrencySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. One 1970 Buick Riviera Bearing Serial No. 494870h910774, and National American Bank of New Orleans, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Bramble v. KleindienstDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1973
  4. United States v. One 1972 Mercedes-Benz 250Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. Fell v. ArmourDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1972

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API