Legal Opinion
Washington v. Lowe's HIW Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 16, 2014No. 3:14-cv-02984-CRBPublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, DENYING MOTION TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
CHARLES R. BREYER, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Now before the Court are three motions to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Lisa Washington’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”): one filed by a group of eight individual defendants (dkt. 20), one filed by individual defendant Robert Niblock (dkt. 26), and one filed by individual defendant Rena Love Galimba (dkt. 27). Because the FAC fails to state a plausible claim for relief on any of its alleged causes of action, the Court…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- (PC) Smith v. ParriotDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
- (PC) Williams v. PriceDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- (PS) Barnett v. CA DMVDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- (PS) Barnett v. CA DMVDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Acosta v. NajiDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.