Legal Opinion

Kurian ex rel. Kurian v. Anisman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 14, 2004PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Facts and Procedural Posture

OPINION BY

OLSZEWSKI, J.:

¶ 1 On April 5, 2000, a medical malpractice action was instituted on behalf of Ancy Kurian (a minor) against Dr. Paul Anis-man, Dr. Jitendra Shah and the Heart Center for Children. A little more than a year later, St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children was also made defendant to the action. Plaintiffs/appellants allege that both Dr. Shah and Dr. Anisman diagnosed Ancy with Down’s syndrome in 1990, but that both doctors failed to properly evaluate and repair the damage to Ancy’s heart and lungs at that time. This failure, it is alleged, has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Toogood v. RogalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Miller v. Brass Rail Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Pappas v. AsbelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. In the Interest of O.A.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Kemp v. QuallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Middletown Athletic Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. ANTHONY BIDDLE CONTRACTORS, INC. v. Preet Allied American Street, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Polett v. Public Communications, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Polett, M., Aplt. v. Public Communications Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  5. Burger v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API