Legal Opinion
National Treasury Employees Union v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 8, 2005No. 03-1351PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAREN LECRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge.
The National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU or Union) petitions for review of a decision by the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA or Authority) concluding that its proposals to define the scope of the duty to bargain mid-term constitute only a permissive subject of bargaining. Because the Authority failed to adequately set forth its reasoning and also departed from precedent without sufficient explanation, we remand the case.
I. Background
The NTEU serves as the exclusive bargaining representative of employees of the U.S. Customs Service (Service or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms v. Federal Labor Relations AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- National Labor Relations Board v. Wooster Division of Borgwarner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- National Labor Relations Board v. Lion Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Adamo Wrecking Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- National Federation of Federal Employees v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Natl Treas Empl v. FLRACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Fisher Ex Rel. Fisher v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.