Legal Opinion

Hilam, Inc. v. Petersen Oil Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1935PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The principal question argued upon this appeal and, in our view, the sole question to be determined, is whether the trial court erred in holding that the state of Wisconsin was not entitled to a lien upon the premises of the Petersen Oil Company.

There is no material dispute as to the facts. On and before July 1, 1931, the Petersen Oil Company (hereafter called the company), owned about eight acres of land situated on the north side of the Blue Mound road in Waukesha county. There existed upon this land a filling station and a number of large storage tanks. The company operated both the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lezala v. JazekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Shearer v. BrowneWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Fidelity Assurance Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Ledvina v. EbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Sweeney v. Union State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Sweeney v. Union State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API