Sweeney v. Union State Bank
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion
The following opinion was filed September 28, 1946:
Fritz, J.
(on motion for rehearing). In connection with considering and determining the matters stated in the opinion filed on April 29, 1946, due consideration was given to the contention, — which is repeated by appellants and the Union State Bank on a motion for rehearing, — that upon the motion of the respondents, Loretta Eastman, Nellie Allen, and Katherine and Julia Sweeney, for review under sec. 274.12, Stats., this court was without jurisdiction and those respondents were not entitled to have this court review, reverse, or modify the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stammer v. KitzmillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Lezala v. JazekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Jones v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Ledvina v. EbertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Wisconsin Creameries, Inc. v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.