Ledvina v. Ebert
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
The following opinion was filed Feburary 4, 1941:
Fritz, J.
The questions, which are to be determined on these appeals, arise solely because of provisions in the judgments entered in the actions described in the preceding statement, in relation to the recovery or the denial of recovery of contribution to the defendants Ebert, Blieck and his insurer from the interpleaded defendants Albert Froelich, as administrator, and the Farmers Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. The defendants Ebert, Blieck and his insurer neither appealed from nor seek review of the provisions in the judgments which…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stammer v. KitzmillerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Seligman v. HammondWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Smith v. City of Green BayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Lezala v. JazekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- American Wrecking Co. v. McManusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Feinsinger v. Bard. Feinsinger v. Century Indemnity Co. Feinsinger v. Irving W. Rice & Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Guderyon v. Wisconsin Telephone Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
- Kusick v. KusickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Bohren v. LautenschlagerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Fiedler v. KapsaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.