Legal Opinion
City of Austin v. Paxton
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided July 12, 2018No. CAUSE NO.: AU-17-CA-00843-SSPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SAM SPARKS, SENIOR JUDGE
BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Defendants Attorney General Ken Paxton and Texas Workforce Commission (collectively, the State)'s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction and Failure to State a Claim [# 21], the City of Austin (the City)'s Response [# 24] in opposition, and the State's Reply [# 27] in support. Having reviewed the documents, the governing law, the arguments of counsel, and the file as a whole, the Court now enters the following opinion and order.
Background
The question…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- City of Austin v. AbbottDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2019