Legal Opinion

City of Austin v. Abbott

District Court, W.D. Texas

Decided March 25, 2019No. 1:17-CV-806-RPPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT PITMAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the Court are several motions to dismiss filed by Defendant New Cingular Wireless ("New Cingular"), (Dkt. 35), Defendant ExteNet Systems, Inc. ("ExteNet"), (Dkt. 36), Defendants Greg Abbott (the "Governor") and Ken Paxton (the "attorney general"),1 (Dkt. 37), Defendant Mobilitie LLC ("Mobilitie"), (Dkt. 38), Defendant T-Mobile West LLC ("T-Mobile"), (Dkt. 39), and Defendant Crown Castle NG Central LLC ("Crown Castle"), (Dkt. 42). Given the similarities between the motions and the arguments made by the Defendants, the Court will consider them…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas Democratic Party v. Greg Abbott, GoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  2. CNSP, Inc. v. City of Santa FeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API