Legal Opinion

Gifford v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 28, 1990No. 64,713PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rees, J.:

This is an action initiated by plaintiff Adam Wayne Gifford against defendant Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company to recover benefits under underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage provided to him by a Farm Bureau automobile liability policy. It is a direct action in contract by an insured against his insurer. The only parties to the action are Gifford and Farm Bureau. The purported tortfeasor, Marty K. McAlexander, is not a party to the action. Neither Gifford nor Farm Bureau has brought or sought to bring McAlexander’s liability insurer, Gulf Insurance Company, or any other person or…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Winner v. RatzlaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Central Security Mutual Insurance v. DePintoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Alliance Life Insurance v. Ulysses Volunteer Fireman's Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  4. Ellis v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  5. Krug v. MILLERS'MUTUAL INSURANCE ASS'NSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Evergreen Recycle, L.L.C. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  2. Loucks v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004
  3. Guillan v. WattsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API