Legal Opinion

Hoadley v. San Francisco

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 11, 1876No. 745PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of California. The facts áre stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Me. Chiee Justice Waite

delivered the opinion of the court.

This action was commenced by Hoadley, the appellant, a citizen of California, Jan. 5, 1870, in the District Court for the twelfth judicial district of that. State, to quiet his title to certain of the pueblo lands of the city of San Francisco, granted to that city by the act of Congress passed July 1,1864, 13 Stat. 333, sect. 5, of which, so far as it is material for the determination of this cause, is as follows: —

“ That all the right and title of the United States to the lands within the corporate limits of the city of San Francisco…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Insurance Co. v. ComstockSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. McCune v. EssigSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Standage Ventures, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. State of Arizona and County of PinalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  3. Munholland v. ScottSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1881
  4. McCune v. EssigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1903
  5. Trafton v. NouguesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of California · 1877

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API