Standage Ventures, Inc., an Arizona Corporation v. State of Arizona and County of Pinal
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and RENFREW, * District Judge. BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
Appellants filed this action against the State of Arizona in a court of that state. Arizona removed it to the United States District Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) on the ground that the action “arises under the . . . laws . of the United States.” 28 U. S.C. § 1331(a). The district court denied appellants’ motion to remand. The case was tried, and Arizona prevailed on the merits. Appellants contend that the action was not within the jurisdiction of the district court. We agree.
To…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Shulthis v. McDougalSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Shoshone Mining Co. v. RutterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Joy v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Blackburn v. Portland Gold Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Arnold W. Hilgeford and Martha A. Hilgeford v. The Peoples Bank, Portland, IndianaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Bell & Beckwith v. United States of America, Internal Revenue Service, Donna D. CannonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- Western Aggregates, Inc. v. County of YubaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Standage Ventures, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Lyon v. Gila River Indian CommunityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.