Legal Opinion

Adoption of Easley

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 15, 1966No. Civ. 8114PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoughlin, J.

Appellant is the mother of a two-year-old child adopted by respondents; refused to consent to the adoption; and appeals from the order granting such predicated upon a finding that, after custody of the child had been given to the father by judicial decree, the mother, for a period of one year, failed to communicate with the child when able to do so which, by virtue of section 224 of the Civil Code, obviated the necessity for obtaining her consent.

Section 224 of the Civil Code, in pertinent part, provides: “A legitimate child cannot be adopted without the consent of its parents if living;…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Strudthoff v. YatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Adoption of BurtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Shields v. ShieldsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  5. Adoption of TheveninCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adoption of SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Adoption of Van AndaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API