Legal Opinion

Hickman v. City of Kansas

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 84 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. J. H. Slover, Judge. (1) The act of the legislature, approved March 26, 1885, was exclusive. Baker, Aclm’r, v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 543; Railroad'v. Oakes, 20 Ind. 9; State v. Bittinger, 55 Mo. 596; McCormack v. Railroad, 9 Ind. 283; Baird v. Wells, 22 Pick. 312; Lelcmcl v. Wood-bury, 4 Cush. 245; Hull v. Westfield, 133 Mass. 433; Toioer v. Boston, 10 Cush. 235; Stafford v. Ingersoll, 3 Hill, 38; Sedg. on Construe, of Stat. and Const.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. J. H. Slover, Judge. (1) The act of the legislature, approved March 26, 1885, was exclusive. Baker, Aclm’r, v. Railroad, 36 Mo. 543; Railroad'v. Oakes, 20 Ind. 9; State v. Bittinger, 55 Mo. 596; McCormack v. Railroad, 9 Ind. 283; Baird v. Wells, 22 Pick. 312; Lelcmcl v. Wood-bury, 4 Cush. 245; Hull v. Westfield, 133 Mass. 433; Toioer v. Boston, 10 Cush. 235; Stafford v. Ingersoll, 3 Hill, 38; Sedg. on Construe, of Stat. and Const. Law [2 Ed.], 76, 341, note a, 343, 344. (2) Instruction number 5, given for the respondent and that numbered 6 given at…

1Opinion of the CourtBbace, J.

This is an action, commenced in the circuit court of Jackson County, for damages to plaintiff’s property occasioned by a change of the grade of Ninth street in said city, in which the plaintiff obtained judgment for $1,000, from which the defendant appealed to the Kansas City court of appeals, and the case was certified here, under the constitutional amendment, as involving the decision of a constitutional question.

Plaintiff’s property, which he claims was damaged by the action of defendant, abuts on Ninth street. Previous to the extension of the city limits in 1885, Ninth street was a county…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Werth v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Householder v. City of KansasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  3. Stewart v. City of ClintonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  4. City of Elgin v. EatonIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Thurston v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Brown v. Transcon LinesOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. In Re McNaughtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1909
  5. Swift & Co. v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API