Legal Opinion
Workagegnehu v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 11, 2019No. Civil Action No. 18-0526 (ABJ)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDERED that reasonable, necessary, and causally related medical benefits for the claimant's head, neck, low back, right leg, and right thumb shall continue as long as necessary pursuant to Va. Code § 65.2-603 ; it is further ...
ORDERED that any remaining claims contained in the Employer's Application for Hearing filed January 18, 2018 and Claimant's claim filed March 13, 2018 are dismissed with prejudice.
Id. at 2-3.
On May 10, 2018, six days after the Stipulated Order was entered, defendants WMATA and Wiedefeld filed a motion to dismiss this suit due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sampson v. District of Columbia Retirement BoardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Sichani v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Young v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026