Legal Opinion
Sichani v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 3, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-1584Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ATOUSA VALI SICHANI, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 22-cv-1584 (CRC) WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Atousa Vali 1 sued her former employer, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (“WMATA”), following her termination in the summer of 2021. After her original complaint was dismissed and her motion to file an amended complaint denied without prejudice, Dr. Vali moved to amend her complaint a second time. She now alleges, under District of Columbia law, that WMATA wrongfully…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.