Legal Opinion
Young v. Arbyrd Compress Co.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided June 21, 1946No. 1089PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HULEN, District Judge.
This action, to recover unpaid minimum wages and overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act, Title 29, Secs. 201-219,, U.S.C.A., instituted in the Circuit Court of Dunklin County, Missouri, removed by usual petition, is now before the Court for ruling on motion to remand.
Only one of the grounds urged for remand calls for serious consideration. Are cases based on the Fair Labor Standards Act removable ? The question presented is not new, but is unsettled. In Brantley v. Augustus Ice and Coal Co., D.C., 52 F. Supp. 158, loc. cit. 159, the cases “for removal”…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Healy v. RattaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- George Moore Ice Cream Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rick v. HedrickDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1958
- Dando v. Stonhard Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1950