People v. Cobenais
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Although the hospital showup was suppressed because it was impermissibly suggestive, the close and detailed observations of the defendant separately made during the course of the attacks by each of the two victims of the assaults were sufficient to provide independent bases for the subsequent in-court identifications (People v Ballott, 20 NY2d 600, 606-607; cf. Neil v Biggers, 409 US 188, 199-201).
It was also proper for the Trial Judge to deny defendant’s motion to sever the counts relating to the assault on one victim from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- People v. BallottNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
- People v. HetheringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
- People v. PetersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. PetersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. RamosNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- People v. RichardsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. Lloyd Winston G.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- People v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.