Legal Opinion
Lepage v. Bailey
West Virginia Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1933No. 7674PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Hatcheb, Judge:
This is a. proceeding in mandamus. The .petitioner was regularly appointed a district mine inspector on January 1, 1930, for the term of four years ending December 31, 1933. Commencing with the month of September, 1932, his salary was involuntarily reduced 15% and on March 17, 1933, the chief of the department of mines notified him that his services would not be needed after March 20, 1933. In this .proceeding, the petitioner seeks to compel the mining chief (a) to issue him a requisition for the sum representing the 15% cut on his salary between September 1, 1932, and March…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Mutual Film Corp. v. Industrial Commission of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Commonwealth ex rel. McClain v. LockeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
- Glavey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- State ex rel. Adams v. BurdgeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State ex rel. Thompson v. MortonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
- Schmitt v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Meredith v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Bank of Marlinton v. McLaughlinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1939
- Getty v. GaffySupreme Court of Colorado · 1935
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.