Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Thompson v. Morton

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1954No. 10692; No. 10693PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Given, President:

In these original proceedings in mandamus the controlling facts are the same, and questions of law are identical. They are heard on the petition of the State at the relation of A. Garnett Thompson, in one of the proceedings; the petition of the State at the relation of James M. Donohoe, in the other proceeding; the demurrer and answer of the defendant D. Holmes Morton to the petition of the State at the relation of Thompson; the demurrer and answer of the defendant Hugh F. Hutchinson to the petition of the State at the relation of Donohoe; demurrers to the respective answers;…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Coal & Coke Ry. Co. v. ConleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Harbert v. County Court of Harrison CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Wilson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Sears v. CottrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1858

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. White v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State v. LoyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State ex rel. Pinson v. VarneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State ex rel. City of Wheeling v. RenickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Yantsin v. City of AberdeenWashington Supreme Court · 1959

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API