Legal Opinion

Bank of Marlinton v. McLaughlin

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1939No. CC 603PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Judge:

The sole question herein for decision is the sufficiency of an amended bill to which the trial chancellor sustained a demurrer, and certified to this court the queries whether the plaintiff has presented a cause for equity cognizance, and whether laches appears from the allegations of the amended bill, barring the plaintiff from the right to prosecute this suit.

The proceeding is based on Code, 40-1-1, which condemns conveyances or charges upon real or personal property executed with intent to delay, hinder, or defraud creditors. The object of the suit is to cancel and set aside…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carter v. CarterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Jones v. DanforthNebraska Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Stivens v. SummersOhio Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Ward v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1883
  5. Lepage v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hoffman v. Wheeling Savings & Loan Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Bank of Marlinton v. McLaughlinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Maynard v. Board of Educ. of Wayne CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Cooch v. GrierCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1948
  5. McFillan v. Berkeley County Planning CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API