Legal Opinion
City of Wewoka, Okl. v. Banker
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 5, 1941No. 2125PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
The appellants challenge the jurisdiction of the trial court to award “between solicitor and client” fees to the appellee, W. R. Banker, for services rendered in connection with the foreclosure of certain paving bonds under the Act of 1923 (Chapter 173, Session Laws of Oklahoma, 1923, 11 Oklahoma Statutes Annotated, Section 107), in which suit the solicitor, appellee W. R. Banker, secured the restoration of assessments, penalties and interest against certain property included within Improvement District No. 3, City of Wewoka, Oklahoma. 1 ******The tax assessments,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Harrison v. PereaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hempstead v. Meadville Theological SchoolSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- City of Detroit v. Grinnell Corporation, Manhattan-Ward, Incorporated v. Grinnell Corporation, 1225 Vine Street Building, Inc. v. Grinnell CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Leggett v. Missouri State Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- Oppenlander v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 1974
- Olen F. Featherstone and Martha Featherstone v. Max BarashCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- United States v. Anglin & StevensonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.