Tousey v. Post
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Alpena. (Kelley, J.) Replevin. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action of replevin for a quantity of lumber on dock at the city of Alpena. The defendant was tax collector of the city, claiming to hold the property by virtue of a tax levied under an assessment against the Warren-Lewis Lumber Company, the rolls showing the assessment against that company under the column “Personal,” $52,900, with the tax extended in the proper place. No specific personal property was described.
It appeared on the trial that the property so assessed consisted of the logs from which this lumber was manufactured, which logs were in fact the property of B. E. Warren,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- LeRoy v. East Saginaw City RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
- Lyon v. GuthardMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Petrie Lumber Co. v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Travers v. InsleeMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by11 opinions
- City of Gaylord v. Gaylord City ClerkMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Landis Machine Co. v. Omaha Merchants Transfer Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1942
- Watervliet Paper Co. v. City of Watervliet (In Re Shoreham Paper Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990
- Michigan National Bank v. City of Auburn HillsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
- United States v. State of MichiganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.