Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Ferguson McKinney Dry Goods Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1907No. 1,545PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Petition for Superintending and Revising of Proceedings from the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Texas.

1Opinion of the Court

SHELBY, Circuit Judge.

The question to be decided is whether or not, on the facts disclosed by the record, J. T. Duncan, a bankrupt,, is entitled to have lot No. 9 in block No. 2 in the town of Oakwoods, Tex., worth $2,000, set apart to him as exempt, under the laws of Texas, from the claims of his creditors. Duncan’s claim of homestead exemption, though at first allowed by the referee, was finally decided against him by the referee and by the bankruptcy court, and he seeks, by petition for revision under section 24b of the bankruptcy act of 189S (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 553 [U. S.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hargadene, McKittrick & Co. v. WhitfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Shryock & Rowland v. LatimerTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Hurt v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  4. P. Pfeiffer & Co. v. McNatt & MarchTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Duncan v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1892

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re BakerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
  2. Phillips v. C. Palomo & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  3. In re PresnallDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1909
  4. Phillips v. Palomo & SonsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  5. Lovelace v. USAA Federal Savings Bank (In Re Lovelace)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API