Legal Opinion

P. Pfeiffer & Co. v. McNatt & March

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1888No. 6359PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from Montague. Tried below before Hon. F. E. Finer. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Collard, Judge.

McNatt & March, merchants, were closed out by attachment Eovember 19, 1884, and still owe about $10,000 which they are unable to pay.

Appellants obtained judgment against them for $1603.91, and on October 9, 1886, levied execution on both the lots and houses in controversy, the same being the individual property of L. 0. McEatt. The appellants bought the lots at sheriff’s sale for $100, crediting the amount on the judgment, and had deed made to them by the sheriff July 4,1887. They brought suit for the lots. McEatt set up that the houses on the lots were his business homestead.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wynne v. HudsonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hargadene, McKittrick & Co. v. WhitfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Shryock & Rowland v. LatimerTexas Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. O'NEIL v. MacK Trucks, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Harle v. RichardsTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Postal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. Hinzie v. W. L. Moody & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. Thomas v. CreagerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API