Shryock & Rowland v. Latimer
Texas Supreme Court
Error' from Bowie. Tried below before the Hon. B. T. Estes. The opinion states the case. .
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
The property in controversy originally belonged to J. D. Latimer, one of the defendants in error, who in copartnership with one Cully carried on in a store-house on the lot a mercantile business until about the close of the year 1876, at which time he became financially embarrassed and ceased to do business as a merchant; since that time he has never conducted on the property any mercantile or other business.
The upper part of the house upon the lot was used by Latimer (he being a married man) as a residence, from the first of the year 1876 until about the 1st of…
2Cited by53 opinions
- Wynne v. HudsonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Hargadene, McKittrick & Co. v. WhitfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Vandalia Railroad v. StillwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
- P. J. Willis & Bro. v. MorrisTexas Supreme Court · 1886
- Majeski v. Estate of Majeski, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.