Legal Opinion

Rue v. Helmkampf

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 23, 1983No. 45620PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment entered upon the trial court’s sustention of defendant’s motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

The case involves the issue of the requirement for, and sufficiency of, consideration returned or tendered as a condition for setting aside or cancelling a contract of settlement and release.

The pleadings and affidavits establish the uneontroverted facts of the case. In the spring of 1977, the two plaintiffs individual*77ly and as sole stockholders, directors and officers of Big Bend Square, Inc., a Missouri corporation, entered into a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Osterberger v. Hites Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Gilbert v. RothschildNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  3. Jones v. McGonigleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  4. Nelson v. BrowningSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. Snowden v. Northwest Missouri State UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sales Service, Inc. v. Daewoo Int'l (America) Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Nigro v. AshleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Indelco, Inc. v. Hanson Industries North America-Grove Worldwide, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  4. Romero v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Sondra J. Estle v. Country Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API