Legal Opinion

State v. Schriver

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 17, 1988No. 13245PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, C. J.

The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the Connecticut statute prohibiting risk of injury to a minor is, in the circumstances of this case, unconstitutionally vague. After a jury trial, the defendant, Dale Schriver, was found guilty of one count of risk of injury to a minor in violation of General Statutes § 53-21.1 He appeals from the ensuing sentence of seven years imprisonment.2 We find error and remand with direction to vacate the judgment of conviction.

The jury could reasonably have found the following facts: In the early morning of September 6, 1986, the victim, Stacy, then…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. State v. KulmacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. State v. TweedySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. State v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API